Event chronology
Organized dates and records showing the event, notices, decisions, affected activities, and response.
DELAY & CHANGE IMPACTS
Construction Delay and Time Impact Analysis Services
Evaluate how a defined event affects the CPM schedule and prepare clear, schedule-based documentation for project review, change management, or time-extension discussions.
THE ASSIGNMENT
Connect the event to the schedule path and the project record.
A schedule impact should be evaluated in the context of the project status when the event occurred. The relevant update, data date, remaining logic, affected work, and contemporaneous records all influence the analysis.
CorePath supports schedule-based impact evaluation and documentation. The scope is technical project-controls support and does not replace legal advice, contract interpretation by counsel, or an independent expert opinion when those services are required.
TYPICAL DELIVERABLES
What the project team can receive.
Schedule-source review
Assessment of the relevant baseline and update files, data dates, logic, and milestone forecasts.
Impact fragnet
A logic-linked model of the added or changed work when a prospective TIA approach is appropriate.
Milestone analysis
Comparison of the affected path and forecast dates before and after the modeled event.
Technical narrative
Plain-language explanation of method, inputs, assumptions, schedule effect, and limitations.
Supporting exhibits
Agreed schedule layouts, path reports, chronology tables, and milestone comparisons.
HOW THE WORK MOVES
A defined path from project need to usable deliverable.
The exact scope changes with the contract and available information. The working sequence stays transparent.
Define the question
We identify the event, affected work, relevant contract dates, analysis period, and required deliverable.
Assemble the record
We organize the applicable schedules and supporting project information around a clear chronology.
Analyze the CPM effect
We evaluate the relevant path and model the impact using the agreed method and documented assumptions.
Prepare review documents
We present the schedule result, chronology, exhibits, assumptions, and limitations for project-team review.
QUALITY FOCUS
Checks that protect the usefulness of the schedule.
These are typical review points. Project-specific requirements are added from the contract and agreed scope.
- ✓Correct schedule update and data date selected
- ✓Event chronology supported by records
- ✓Affected activities and path identified
- ✓Model logic and assumptions documented
- ✓Milestone effect separated from unrelated movement
- ✓Technical limitations stated clearly
SERVICE FAQ
Questions before we start.
Start with the project situation. We’ll define the exact inputs and deliverables after reviewing the need.
Is this legal or claims advice?+
No. CorePath provides schedule and project-controls analysis. Legal entitlement, contract interpretation, damages, and expert-opinion requirements should be addressed by the appropriate legal or claims professionals.
What is needed for a time impact analysis?+
Common inputs include the relevant schedule files, contract milestones, event records, notices, change documents, progress information, and a clear description of the affected work.
Can you create a fragnet?+
Yes, when a fragnet-based prospective analysis fits the project question and available schedule record. The added activities and logic should be supported by the event scope and team input.
Can you analyze an event after the work occurred?+
Potentially, but the appropriate method and reliability depend on the available contemporaneous schedules and records. We first review the record and define a suitable scope.
BRING US THE CURRENT NEEDWhat is due, at risk,
What is due, at risk,
or changing?
Share the project type, scheduling requirement, and immediate deadline. No files are required for the first conversation.
Discuss Your Project →